When the polls don’t fit the narrative, Andrew Sullivan explains, absurdity ensues:
Of course, I thought – silly me – that there must have been two battleground tracking polls and they were just showing different results. Nope. This is exactly the same poll. It turns out that Fred Barnes just outright ignored the actual top-line results and extracted the more subjective of Republican analyst’s (Ed Goeas) take on them (in a memo sent out to GOPers), based on much more subjective ideas of the intensity of the vote – as conducted in a snap poll for their model on one day.
